CHANGE.
i listened to NPR on the way to work this morning as i always do. they had a small segment about a guy who has been given the task to raise money to help stop climate control in developing countries.
when i hear stuff like this, i feel like both sides of my brain are crashing at once.
one feature of being a liberal is that your fellow liberals don't need to be cut from the same cloth as you. which is why when there is a democratic-led congress and presidency, republicans just want to throw up and waste our time rattling off those increasingly frequent buzz words, "pork" and, now, "ear marks." yes -- we don't always agree. but i think the politics of galvanizing and navigating such a mixed bunch, if one is successful at it, apprises one with great experience with reality.
so back to NPR -- after that small story, i felt some liberal discontent.
and this is why.
i think politics is the practice between principals and practicality.
my core is rested on science and history (human science). things die and things are born. when i hear that XX million dollars are being used on reversing any environmental damage human-use may have caused to reduce the population of a chipmunk that ONLY lives in that habitat, i sit in my commute and purse my lips.
i don't think humans are special. i think we're animals. and in that sense, i draw a line between saving the polar bear and ice caps and this fucking chipmunk population of 400 in a remote area in northern california.
what i don't understand is what is our OBSESSION with trying to either retain some sort of status-quo or trying to turn BACK the hands of time.
polar bears. yeah we fucked up. we fucked up so bad that now polar bears have no hunting grounds. and yes, as a scholar of Planet Earth, i know that polar bears need these ice caps to feed. i also know that the ecological system down there is MUCH more fragile. there aren't that many animals PERIOD. fucking up their food chain has gross effects. THAT i get and support.
but this chipmunk whose populations MIGHT be in danger because they are moving north? or developing countries who really need food and need funding for infrastructure to get a solid self-functioning economy started?
i don't fucking get it. if we all group together and focus on a few goals, it would be less money and human effort wasted. there needs to be SOME cost-analysis. do humans have some self-defacing GUILT for creating cars and being retarded with the planet? people who really believe in science should open their eyes and see things for what they are. the tendency to categorize and to map out ever intricate eco-system has caused lots of money wasted. bleah.
i listened to NPR on the way to work this morning as i always do. they had a small segment about a guy who has been given the task to raise money to help stop climate control in developing countries.
when i hear stuff like this, i feel like both sides of my brain are crashing at once.
one feature of being a liberal is that your fellow liberals don't need to be cut from the same cloth as you. which is why when there is a democratic-led congress and presidency, republicans just want to throw up and waste our time rattling off those increasingly frequent buzz words, "pork" and, now, "ear marks." yes -- we don't always agree. but i think the politics of galvanizing and navigating such a mixed bunch, if one is successful at it, apprises one with great experience with reality.
so back to NPR -- after that small story, i felt some liberal discontent.
and this is why.
i think politics is the practice between principals and practicality.
my core is rested on science and history (human science). things die and things are born. when i hear that XX million dollars are being used on reversing any environmental damage human-use may have caused to reduce the population of a chipmunk that ONLY lives in that habitat, i sit in my commute and purse my lips.
i don't think humans are special. i think we're animals. and in that sense, i draw a line between saving the polar bear and ice caps and this fucking chipmunk population of 400 in a remote area in northern california.
what i don't understand is what is our OBSESSION with trying to either retain some sort of status-quo or trying to turn BACK the hands of time.
polar bears. yeah we fucked up. we fucked up so bad that now polar bears have no hunting grounds. and yes, as a scholar of Planet Earth, i know that polar bears need these ice caps to feed. i also know that the ecological system down there is MUCH more fragile. there aren't that many animals PERIOD. fucking up their food chain has gross effects. THAT i get and support.
but this chipmunk whose populations MIGHT be in danger because they are moving north? or developing countries who really need food and need funding for infrastructure to get a solid self-functioning economy started?
i don't fucking get it. if we all group together and focus on a few goals, it would be less money and human effort wasted. there needs to be SOME cost-analysis. do humans have some self-defacing GUILT for creating cars and being retarded with the planet? people who really believe in science should open their eyes and see things for what they are. the tendency to categorize and to map out ever intricate eco-system has caused lots of money wasted. bleah.
Leave a comment

